VIZ. ARTS
Weekly meditations from your humble messenger

Farewell to the Master
(Persona, 8/20/07)
By Nicholas Nicastro

The recent, near-simultaneous deaths of Sweden's Ingmar Bergman and Italy's Michelangelo Antonioni mark the real terminus of film's first century, and perhaps the end of its "classical" age. Though we live in faith that another Fellini, Welles, or Bergman is always just around the corner, there are no guarantees that any artform will continue to replenish itself from some wellspring of fresh geniuses. The tragedies of ancient Greece, for instance, never recovered from the death of Euripides; classical music can be divided between the time before Beethoven, and after him. Future generations of critics may say something similar for movies after the death of Bergman.
      By way of retrospective, I recently watched Persona (1966), one of the director's most original and challenging films. Based on a story by Bergman himself, the film is a chamber piece for two instruments—the beautiful and haunted Elizabet (Liv Ullmann), and her vivacious but insecure nurse, Alma (Bibi Andersson). Elizabet, a renowned actress, hasn't spoken since going silent in mid-performance three months before; Alma has been assigned as a companion to lure her back into congress with her fellow humans. What occurs at the seaside retreat they share isn't "healing" as much as a kind of mutual, compensatory infection. Alma, who begins as a well-meaning but superficial careerist, adopts Elizabet's artistic detachment and, perhaps, her cruelty. Elizabet finds that even her silence is no protection against becoming drawn into the drama—or comedy—-of her life.
      The plot isn't really what Persona is about. Bergman fills it with reminders that his film is a story, a contrivance: at one point, the violent conflict between Alma and Elizabet literally sputters, stops, and burns a hole in the celluloid. In another context this might be called an act of Brechtian distancing, but here it isn't as patently political as that word usually implies. Bergman was a seducer, not a revolutionary, and his subject was the masks ("personae") usually associated with actors. When, in the film's key image, Elizabet gestures as if to clear away Alma's professional mask, the act seems compassionate, if not necessarily liberating.
      Even now, more than forty years after it was made, fresh "solutions" to the puzzles of Persona are still turning up on the internet. Sorting out its levels of meaning isn't as important here as the fact that it inspires passionate questioning. The idea that film should be taken seriously—that it is an art that should not just amuse, but challenge, and that viewers should expect to find their noggins stimulated as well as their glands, is next to dead in America. Perhaps more tragic, its passing is barely lamented, as generations have grown up since knowledge of foreign and classic film was considered de rigueur for a modern education.
      Bergman, who retired from feature filmmaking in the mid-1980's, was not just the brooding eccentric legend has made of him. He was, at root, someone who preferred to fend off his demons by surrounding himself with beautiful women. (The film he released just before Persona had the English title All These Women.) Andersson and Ullmann were two of his celebrated companions; the farcical nature of seduction, the pursuit of sex and the existential disappointment that forever attends it, were always among his themes. If he had made just one more film, it should have been an adaptation of the Memoirs of his 18th century counterpart, Giacomo Casanova. Now that would have singed a few frames, wouldn't it?


©2007 Nicholas Nicastro

back to Culture Blog

Home   Novels   Culture Blog   Bio   News   Contact

www.nicastrobooks.com